Net Zero News: 2025 Year in Review

Subscribe Now to receive Net Zero News directly in your inbox every week.

A Year Defined by Clarity Over Comfort

The most-read stories in 2025 reveal a decisive shift in what readers value: clarity over comfort. The year opened with the Trump administration’s return and a visible pullback from public net-zero commitments in the U.S., punctuated by the suspension of the Net Zero Asset Managers initiative. Yet as the most-read articles show, the underlying investment reality didn’t disappear.

Climate risk became harder to discuss publicly, but harder still to ignore privately.

From a warning that pension funds could face a 33% return hit in a failed transition, to hedge funds declaring “clean is dead for now,” readers engaged most with coverage that translated climate into risk, resilience, and returns. Capital didn’t abandon the transition; it rotated, away from labeled “green” assets and toward infrastructure, grids, and transition enablers.

At the same time, global momentum continued, with technologies like floating offshore wind advancing regardless of U.S. policy uncertainty.

The message from 2025 is clear: the energy transition is moving into a tougher, more fragmented phase, and understanding that shift is now a core investment skill.

Key Themes That Defined 2025

Climate risk went fully fiduciary: The conversation shifted decisively from aspirational commitments to balance sheet reality. Institutional investors began treating climate factors with the same rigor applied to credit risk or regulatory exposure.

From Net Zero promises to portfolio reality: Public pledges gave way to private risk management. Asset owners focused less on alliance memberships and more on how climate factors affect valuations, insurance availability, and long-term returns.

“Clean” vs. the Energy Transition – A growing divide: Markets distinguished between politically labeled “clean” investments and the broader industrial transformation required for energy transition: grids, storage, critical minerals, and enabling infrastructure.

Policy volatility reshaped the investable universe: Investors sought assets and geographies with regulatory stability while managing exposure to increasingly divergent national climate policies.

Resilience and physical risk moved center stage: Extreme weather impacts on infrastructure, insurance markets, and supply chains elevated physical climate risk from theoretical concern to immediate investment constraint.

What Surprised Us

How quickly public climate alignment gave way to private, firm-level risk management: Major institutions exited public net zero alliances while simultaneously deepening internal climate risk assessment capabilities. The work continued, just more quietly.

How policy uncertainty reshaped where capital flowed, not whether it flowed: Despite U.S. policy headwinds, global clean energy investment remained robust, with capital migrating toward markets offering regulatory clarity and transition commitment.

How persistent “paper decarbonization” remained despite political pressure: As scrutiny of climate commitments intensified, some institutions focused on portfolio carbon metrics that looked good on paper without necessarily driving real-world emissions reduction.

How fast physical climate risk became a deployment and insurance constraint: Extreme weather events translated directly into investment decisions, with projects facing delays, cost overruns, or outright cancellation due to climate hazards and insurance unavailability.

The Top 10 Most-Read Net Zero News Articles of 2025

1. 07 Nov — Pension funds risk 33% return loss from failed climate transition: Ortec
2. 17 Jan — Net Zero Asset Managers initiative to suspend activities in wake of BlackRock departure
3. 25 Apr — US climate tech investment achieves six straight months of growth
4. 10 Oct — Floating offshore wind industry is off to the races, with or without the US
5. 07 Mar — Hedge fund built on energy bets says ‘Clean is dead for now’
6. 25 Apr — Google chooses geothermal power in latest landmark deal to power data centres
7. 31 Oct — Wind power delivers £104 billion net benefit to UK consumers
8. 12 Sep — Clean hydrogen investment soars past $110 billion
9. 24 Oct — Report: Climate adaptation investment benefits outweigh costs fourfold
10. 29 Aug — Physical climate risks threaten Europe’s renewable energy push: Zurich

What This Means for 2026

The next phase of the energy transition will reward realism.

Public alliances may continue to weaken, but climate risk will increasingly surface through valuation, insurance availability, system reliability, and cost of capital. Investors will need to look past labels and focus on assets that work under uncertainty.

Meanwhile, the gap between U.S. and global transition pathways is likely to widen, with long-term competitive consequences. Europe and Asia are doubling down on industrial decarbonization and energy security, while U.S. policy creates bifurcated markets, with some states and sectors accelerating transition investments while federal support remains limited and uncertain.

In 2026, lower visibility will not mean lower risk. Fiduciary clarity, global perspective, and physical-risk awareness will matter more than ever.

Don’t miss a single edition. Subscribe to Net Zero News and receive it in your inbox every week.